Polyg Talk > General Polyg Talk > Polygamy
Your Ad Here
Full Version: FLDS children & Mark Shurtliff
1 yankie
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=3269766


Personally , I think this is about as crazy of a idea as I've heard for some time .

Utah's Attorney General Mark Shurtliff needs to get the axe , its doubtful but maybe he might find work in Texas as a Private Fist Class Attorney if he's lucky . LOL . tongue.gif
Cactus Jim
QUOTE (1 yankie @ May 9 2008, 07:42 PM)
http://www.ksl.com/index.php?nid=148&sid=3269766


Personally , I think this is about as crazy of a idea as I've heard for some time .

Utah's Attorney General Mark Shurtliff needs to get the axe , its doubtful but maybe he might find work in Texas as a Private Fist Class Attorney if he's lucky . LOL . tongue.gif

I'm with you Yank. Shurtleff seems to be saying these kids should be brought up in a polygamous environment because they are polygs. Let's just keep the abuse that is inherent in polygamy going forever. After all this is the Utah culture and heritage. I'll grant that the Centennial Park gang is less abusive, but the potential is always there. The only reason they've held the lid on is because they get a stream of convert women from mainstream LDS. Otherwise they'd be running off boys and keeping girls ignorant and pregnant just like FLDS. Women in polygamy of necessity are like cows in a herd.
1 yankie
QUOTE (Cactus Jim @ May 11 2008, 05:53 AM)
I'm with you Yank.


" Shurtleff seems to be saying these kids should be brought up in a polygamous environment because they are polygs. "

Yup , that's kinda what I think he's saying also Cactus, but not just that, but suggesting that Utah has no intentions of increasing their marginal efforts to cut back on the FLDS from growing into a larger problem than it is now .

What's it going to take for Utah to wise up ? They have a religious sect who's prophet was on the FBI's most wanted list and a fugitive from the law for years . One who promotes underage marriages , child abandonment and who has a track record of pilfering and abusing public funds .

Even though Warren may be in jail you're still going to have wantabe Warrenites following his good example by breaking the law and with no regard for anyone but themselves .

Shutliff is a ass and should be replaced . The way he talks out of both sides of his mouth is pathetic at best . His Idea of continuing Utah as a polygamy- 'Safe Zone -" is the very reason the FLDS have spiraled down to the levels they are today . If nothing is done to control these folks its only going to get worse .

The FLDS aint about trying to fix themselves , Nope , for that to happen someone is going to have to step in kinda like Texas has done .

Utah has been putting off the inevitable for years hoping they wouldn't have to do what Texas has done . I think its not-- IF -- a Utah raid will happen , but --when --it will happen .

Given now Texas has shown A raid ( rescue ) can be accomplished with out a blood bath takes away one of the excuses Utah has used these many years .

In Texas the FLDS beg the Attorney General for consideration. While in Utah the Attorney General begs the FLDS for compliance , that alone in my mind is the greatest difference between Texas and Utah's feeble and doomed approach .
Self Proclaimed Greatness
QUOTE (Cactus Jim @ May 11 2008, 05:53 AM)
I'm with you Yank. Shurtleff seems to be saying these kids should be brought up in a polygamous environment because they are polygs. Let's just keep the abuse that is inherent in polygamy going forever. After all this is the Utah culture and heritage. I'll grant that the Centennial Park gang is less abusive, but the potential is always there. The only reason they've held the lid on is because they get a stream of convert women from mainstream LDS. Otherwise they'd be running off boys and keeping girls ignorant and pregnant just like FLDS. Women in polygamy of necessity are like cows in a herd.

You know Jim, you've got a lot of nerve. In one post, you claim that you would not be so audicious to stand up and claim to speak for God, yet you do. You want to tell people how to live their lives.

It's like you haven't heard a word any of us said.

Inherent problems in polygamy? So what is excuse for the rest of America? Are they pligs too, or the same problem inherent in monogamy?

That your mind even thinks that it has the right or the desire to impose YOUR WILL on these people just makes me think that you are the psychopath.

You know, maybe you haven't been saying anything else all along, but this post really hurts me.

God/Nature, whatever the hell you want to call give us the right to have children and you want take that away from us? To claim that if we believe a certain way, we should not be allowed children?

You are one sick man.

Whatever respect I might have been gaining for you and Flora's cause just fell apart. There is nothing you will ever say that will make me trust you two. You are no better then those you claim to hate, just on a mission to do God's work, no matter who gets hurt.

I dare say I'm truly disgusted. . . . . uck.
Cactus Jim
It's true I haven't heard much of what you are saying. You post too dam much to read and it's all the same apologetic pap anyway. You also make some of the stupidest analogies I've ever seen. You compare Texas CPS taking children into custody for their protection to someone raiding Chas's place and arresting engineers. What are you smoking?

There are so many things you don't understand. You confuse our constitutional rights in criminal law with the rights of parents. Nobody has the right to keep children in abusive situations. CPS has the absolute right to take whatever action they think is necessary to protect children. That has nothing to do with your right to a fair trial in a criminal case. Nothing whatever. Your continual braying about it just shows you are as ignorant as the rest of the polygs.

You call me a psychopath because I pointed out that Joseph Smith and all the rest of your polyg leaders lives fell into that definition. You didn't want to hear it so you used it as a name to call me. This only shows you are as ignorant of psychology as you are of the law.

We've talked about the inherent abuse of polygamy before. Unless you can explain the mathematics of having a few old horn dogs scarf up the women while the young men who ought to be marrying up with them go without, I'll say it's inherently abusive. Virtually every polyg society on earth ends up being repressive and backwards, as anyone can see if they actually THINK about it. Greatness.

Just keep posting this same stuff there Greatness. Some folks who visit here don't know anything about living polygamy and it's good for them to see the product of a polyg upbringing.

You want to look at a sick man? Take a look at how you wax so eloquent about your polyg friends being deprived if their right to beat and screw children. If you want to see a really sick person, go look in your mirror.
1 yankie
QUOTE (Self Proclaimed Greatness @ May 12 2008, 06:27 AM)


I dare say I'm truly disgusted. . . . . uck.

Hi LC

Let me chime in here for a moment , actually what Cactus mentioned in some ways is kinda scriptural if you think about it .

Joe Smith kinda said it was nature and disposition of all mankind once they receive a little authority it goes straight to their head and they begin to practice unrighteous dominion . This fits ol Warren to a tee wouldn't you say ? How many other polygamy leaders would this rule of thumb fit ? How many of these guys come to your mind right now ? Like maybe most of these different polygamy group leaders ? ?

You mentioned what Cactus said hurt you , well what I want to do is have a little fun , will you LC make a post of all the different polygamy break off groups from the Mormon church and list their priesthood leaders and prophets they have had over the years ?

You do this for me and I'll give the history of the murders , fraud and child abuses of these various polygamist leaders .

Cactus said in his post regarding abuses "but the potential is always there " well he was right however I'll go one step further and say " the historical evidence is there as well , kinda like prove to the pudding I would have to say , there have been inherent problems with the Mormon polygamy break off groups . More so amongst the highest church leaders than any other religious following I'm aware of .


How many times LC has one group of polygamist leaders tried to" off " their rival polygamist leaders ?

Also when was the last time in any christian church a rival church assassinated the other guy's leader ?

You see LC , what Cactus said is kinda scriptural , and if anything we know by now it has been the nature and disposition of allot of Utah's polygamy leaders to practice unrighteous dominion on their own ,and other polygamist . Well , if looking at the past says anything to you .

Naw , Cactus aint a psychopath , Warren is . Could Kingston , Swapp , la Baron, Singer and others have psychopathic traits ?

Well when you make your list of polygamist leaders lets see how they hold up to your accusation shall we .


OK LC , show me you can have fun now .







Cactus Jim
QUOTE (1 yankie @ May 12 2008, 07:00 PM)
Hi LC

Let me chime in here for a moment , actually what Cactus mentioned in some ways is kinda scriptural if you think about it .

Well thanks Yank. It's always good to know that when I get in a rumble you have my back, at least as long as it's not you I'm rumbling with.

I was going even a bit further in that I don't say the problem is just with Polygs. It's with cults. These cult leaders are as alike as peas in a pod. They all isolate and plunder their followers, rewrite scripture to suit themselves as the new Messiah, and they all engage in sex with followers. Generally that includes with followers children. Some of them are bisexual and they command in the name of god that both men and women turn it over. Others are more conventional, only demanding wives and daughters. You find this same pattern over and over; David Koresh, Jim Jones, Bhagwan Shree, Joseph Smith, and if one were brave one might ask if the life of Mohammad followed the pattern. This Yahweh gang in Texas is the same oh same oh all over again. Rick Ross has a great website on the cultish groups active today. http://www.rickross.com/

I'm thinking we've never done a very good job of dealing with these groups. We have the tradition is USA of respecting relgion, even if it's obviously a cover for nefarious activity. Generally the pattern is the great leader gets more and more outrageous until he brings on a clash he can't win. Usually they lead themselves to destruction. Joseph Smith came very close with his showdowns in Missouri and Nauvoo. In Missouri the massacre at Hauns Mill snapped him back to reality and saved the day. At Nauvoo his lynching gave them the break they needed. If not for those things Mormonism would have gone the way of David Koresh.

What I'm thinking is we have to do is break up the isolation. It's hard to think of a legal structure to keep people from isolating themselves, but that is the point where these guys depart acceptable behavior. When they've got their followers isolated from the world, then the feeding frenzy can get in full swing. Maybe a starting point would be to insist that their children attend public schools. That would prevent them from isolation due to ignorance of the outside world.
Self Proclaimed Greatness
Jim and Yank, I don’t feel much like having fun. Maybe this is funny to you guys. . . ., me, I’m just sick to my stomach right now.

I know the history pretty well, for a layman. I don’t need you to point our all of the recorded crimes of polygamous history.

I just get so confused when talking with you people. Do you honestly think monogamy produces a better result, a better brand of people?

I could go on for hours, about how the different aspects of cults are part of everyone’s life. I could demonstrate how G.W. Bush isn’t that much different then Warren Jeffs, maybe even worse. But you guys don’t care!! You don’t have to look at it, because no one is breathing down your throats, threatening to take away your children, culture, home, and religion.

As for Jim being scriptural . . . . . so the whole sale slaughter of thousands of innocent people. Rome killed thousands, murdered every opposing voice, and then wrote the scriptures.

Who was in power then? The cult, or the government? Don’t give me this, “history of crime” BS. The entire history my culture could be written as crimes of the government. Their neglect is . . . . .

I’ve got to go.
chaster
QUOTE (Self Proclaimed Greatness @ May 13 2008, 01:09 PM)
I could go on for hours, about how the different aspects of cults are part of everyone’s life. I could demonstrate how G.W. Bush isn’t that much different then Warren Jeffs, maybe even worse. But you guys don’t care!! You don’t have to look at it, because no one is breathing down your throats, threatening to take away your children, culture, home, and religion.

Man, I'm having difficulty with this forum, not due to what anyone is saying but because the server for this forum must be using a dial up connection at 19k baud or something. Jeez, it's frustrating.

Well, Greatness, I feel your pain in not being taken seriously, especially by one guy in particular on here who shall remain Yankie, but let's not go there again.

America, the cult, seems to be a thread that runs through your posts a lot. In other words, hey, it's all cultural relativity. The predominent culture is the cult that decides what is a cult and what isn't.

Ok, you have a point there. Still, one, that's a bit of using ambiguity as a cloud to hide in.

Secndly, the line is fuzzy, yes, but there is a difference between a culture and a cult. It's a matter of degrees. In a culture you have kind of a mad house of competing ideas. In a cult you have one idea that is rigidly enforced that is absolutely intolerant of any other ideas.

In a culture, yes, you have narrow minded intolerant people who continually bicker with other narrow minded intolerant people, but the argument isn't arbitrarily settled once and for all through authority. It'd be nice if some of the arguments could be settled, especially those that do have some potential to be answered through straightforward means. Still, as frustrating as it is that the arguments sometimes go on longer than they should, I have to admit that that's preferable to the argument being settled by a church authority of some kind.

In a cult, the debate is settled and there's no opportunity for appeal.

I mean, here, yes, it's true that people are maddenlingly closed minded on occasion but at least you do have some kind of a voice. If Warren Jeffs were running the show, do you think you'd have one iota of a possibility of ever freely expressing yourself openly for anything other than Warren is Great, Warren is Great, Warren is Great, the Great Compassionate Leader is Great?
chaster
Part of this debate as to what constitutes religious freedom goes to what is freedom in general. Here's a concept of freedom:

Within the constraints of successfully balancing competing values, there is infinite freedom.

Your freedom, yes, is at risk from me, but it's more in peril from you. There are some important safegards of freedom I think we need to maintain at all costs, but there're no gurantees of freedom. At best, we only ever have just a shot at it.

I thing I preach to myself now and then: Keep telling the truth as you see it. Don't worry so much about whether people are convinced by it.
Cactus Jim
QUOTE (Self Proclaimed Greatness @ May 13 2008, 06:09 AM)
I could demonstrate how G.W. Bush isn’t that much different then Warren Jeffs, maybe even worse.

Well, if you'd like to shoot them both I'd be glad to mail you the bullets.

Of course I'm not advocating shooting the President. No not me, nope, bad idea. Just if you did I'd not be saddened. Well, maybe saddened that you had to go to jail if you got caught. That'd be about ti.
Cactus Jim
Anyway, you ripped me a new one a few posts back. You've known me long enough to know I'm back at you when you do that. .

Now, I have some important personal news. I did something I didn't expect today. I actually got out an oscilloscope and used it to troubleshoot a troublesome and baffling problem. Geez, I can't even remember the last time I used an actual oscilloscope. It was like reliving the happy parts of my childhood. It was GREAT! Had a little problem finding one as nobody could remember whether we'd thrown it out last cleanup. I even took pictures and sent them to the manufacturer. Via E-Mail of course.

OK, I just had to get that off my chest.

QUOTE
I just get so confused when talking with you people.  Do you honestly think monogamy produces a better result, a better brand of people?
Yes, absolutely. When I've been to pligville it was an unhappy, repressive and fearful place. I'm not exactly sure that being happy is the ultimate purpose of humanity, but it sure beats the hell out of living like they do. You muddle your thinking too much with faulty comparisons. You can't justify the multifaceted abuses you know first hand about in polygamy by saying some people are unhappy out in the world. I know lots of people who are very happy and who have been able to achieve what they are capable of doing and chose to do. They may not be inherently better people - hell, who can make a value judgment like that - but they sure are better off.

QUOTE
You don’t have to look at it, because no one is breathing down your throats, threatening to take away your children, culture, home, and religion.

Perhaps that's because I'm not sending daughters off to my priesthood leader so he can rape them. Listen, we've plowed this ground over and over. You accuse me of not listening to you. When are you going to start listening to me? Nobody is out to crush their stupid religion. We should, given it's path of destruction, but we have this respect for religious rights. All anyone has done in Texas is try to protect children who face rank abuse. It's the victimization. You are considering the victimization.

QUOTE
The entire history my culture could be written as crimes of the government.  Their neglect is . . . . .
That's bullshit and you know it. Your culture has flaunted the law since it's inception and nobody has ever succeeded in getting them to conform as the rest of us have to. Your culture hasn't missed out on any welfare program. You've been treated with kid gloves. The only neglect the government has heaped on you is to neglect to enforce just and necessary laws that you choose to ignore. The government is certainly guilty of failing to protect your girls from the sexual predators who run your culture.

QUOTE

I just get so confused when talking with you people.
Yea It shows. Well keep plugging away at it. You'll sort it out. You don't dishonor your family by looking at them objectively.
Self Proclaimed Greatness
QUOTE (chaster @ May 13 2008, 11:34 AM)
I mean, here, yes, it's true that people are maddenlingly closed minded on occasion but at least you do have some kind of a voice. If Warren Jeffs were running the show, do you think you'd have one iota of a possibility of ever freely expressing yourself openly for anything other than Warren is Great, Warren is Great, Warren is Great, the Great Compassionate Leader is Great?

Chaster,

It isn't like that. When Bro. Johnson was convinced by the Barlow boys that he was God's only power, he asked my dad, A. Timpson, AND R. Jeffs to step down. All of them did. All were willing to follow the lead.

However, about 1/3 chose to NOT FOLLOW. There was a disagreement and like culture, there was a split. Culture is just a bunch of cults. The polygamist CULTURE is made up of polygamist cults.

When Warren Jeffs claimed to be Jesus, a bunch of people DID leave. He only got into power because of people's desire for salvation, their fear, their stupidity, and their weakness. I dare say that less then half of what was that group 20 years ago follows the "leader" now. Perhaps much less.

All or most of the polygamist culture started with Joseph Smith 150 years, none are currently part of his church.

Warren is a wort on this culture, he did not start it and he does not rule it. He rules the FLDS, perhaps 5% of the culture. Some say that as many of 100,000 people are involved in polygamy.

I am NOT EVEN part of the cults and I have a voice in some of them. I talk to people and they listen (to some degree.)

I have no problem with the word cult, I totally agree that this is a cult, but it is also a culture. America is a cult and a culture. In the global sense, America is a cult that much of the world fears and even hates. If they had the power, they would crush it.

For the inside, it is a culture. It's a matter of perspective.
Self Proclaimed Greatness
Jim, I’m happy that you found oscilloscope. You said that you found it yesterday? Damn, maybe I am tuned into you more then I thought. Yesterday I was sitting at my table, eating my lunch, minding my own business and then suddenly I get this thought, “I should get me an oscilloscope!!” It felt good for a minute then I thought, “I haven’t used an oscilloscope in 10 years, what the hell would I do with one now?” I thought of checking a couple of different types of signals and realized that I don’t do anything that really requires one. . . . but I was still tempted. Weird!!!

Just for record, I take some pride in my confusion. When I was deep in the cult, my confidence was unshakeable. In many ways, my confusion is admission to the truth of my knowledge. I have come to the conclusion that confidence, while sexy, is usually an illusion.

I’ve been on the outside for about 14 years now, Jim. The ONLY REASON and I have brother William that back me up on this, that I defend and support this culture is the happy faces. William, a brother about 7 years older, left and joined the army when he was 19. After about 5 he came back, left, and came back. He told me one day that the only thing that kept him coming back was the smiling faces. He said that “without the smiling faces I would have gotten on my Harley and never looked back.”

I know that in among the FLDS that there is fear, tiredness, and sadness in their faces since Warren took over. That wasn’t there before. Perhaps some fear and distrust of strangers, but there was always greeting, hugs, and laughter when people met, B.W. (Before Warren.)

Priesthood leaders are NOT known to rape the girls. I’m not sure if even Warren ever did that. That is simple speculation and rather mean at that. I personally am not fond of the priesthood leaders (well, maybe a few), but I’ve NEVER heard of a case of rape from any of them, not even rumor. Even Warren’s case was “accomplice” because he married the girl to the rapist. That case still stinks of injustice, why wasn’t the rapist charged? Texas was simply reckless. I’m not saying they won’t find cases of abuse, but all of those children were not abused. And aside from their sick stupidity with underage marriages, I’m not sure they will find a case.

In some states, marriage with parental consent can happen at 13. Just because these people are a little behind the times doesn’t make them criminals. I mean, look at Elvis Presley, his girl friend was 13 and we still call him the King.

Yes, I agree that government failed to enforce just and necessary laws that “SOME OF US” chose to ignore. Do you think that every prev in the nation wouldn’t be excited if the government announced that they wouldn’t enforce laws against sex crimes? I mean, get real.

I left at a young age, but I remember some of the characters that would come to town. While I was offended that they treated badly, sometimes even beaten and dropped off somewhere out of town, I remember thinking, “why does this town attract such weirdoes, we aren’t that way.” But as I got older, I realized, they all think that we are sexual prevs and that they can get a peace of the action. And suddenly, I didn’t feel so bad about our reputation for running people out of town. Some of it was totally unjust, but some of it was our only way of protecting our people. We did some so strange ones. Guys that would wear “Jesus Robes” and flash people as they passed.

Canebeds became a hot spot for weirdoes too, (a small community just outside of Colorado City.) They weren’t welcome in town, so they settled outside of town. Even the few that thought if they were good they would get a wife got discouraged after a few years. But a few have stayed on, even after 10 years without getting married, because they believe the religion . . . with some skepticism. But the point is, I agree, the government didn’t protect us. We had to protect ourselves, without the use of a judge and jails. And that neglect gave birth to the abuse of power that Warren Jeffs enjoys today.

What you call “ignoring” as if it was doing us a favor is simply denial of the responsibilities that the government had to us. True, I didn’t look at it that at the time, but I see it now.

It reminds me of a situation. There was a young man named Chuck that I worked with. He was such a trouble maker, genus in some ways, idiot in others. He probably had a bad case of ADHD, or Aspergers Syndrome. But his father didn’t know what to do with him, and he had a large family. The kid was always bring drugs home, porn, and other stuff the dad didn’t want around the other kids. When Chuck was about 16 he was kicked out of the house. Not left without a home exactly, he just wasn’t welcome at the main home. His dad channeled money to him through his mother and more or less told him to stay away.

Perhaps is was the only thing the dad could have done. I mean, I worked with this kid and you couldn’t reason with him. I’m ashamed to admit that I actually “lost it one day” and hit him and I’d never done anything like that before or after. But in many ways, that is what the government did to us. Perhaps we weren’t the child they hoped for, but they still had a responsibility to us. Just funneling money to us to keep us quiet didn’t met their responsibility.

And I don’t care so much they abandoned us. . . .I can understand why. But to come back and make it sound like we should bare full responsibility of what happened, I going to cry foul. They DID ABANDON us. Our religion was about family and marriage. We WERE NOT separatists!!! Over the past 150 years we have been mobs and armies sent against us, raided, rejected, mocked, jailed, and hunted for our RELIGION, not for crimes.

So don’t give me that “Nobody is out to crush our stupid religion.” If you truly believe that, I can understand your confusion about why we get so defensive. In spite of what you might think, we’re not a bunch of whiners. We have cut a living out of some rough places. We worked hard to build our communities. We have suffered in many ways, both physically and emotionally because of the separation and isolation from the rest of America. But we did it because of our faith and their need to reject us because of it. And you don’t hear them complaining about what they have endured because of the isolation, but rather them just saying, “trust us with respect or leave us alone.” Funneling money to shut us up was just shame money and most of wanted nothing to do with it. Some, those that were poor or bitter took the money, but most did not, until Warren came along and saw an opportunity to “bleed the beast.”

As for you comment about Bush and Warren. . . . I agree. But you can’t shoot Bush anymore then Warren’s members can shoot him. And we can’t get rid of Bush anymore then Warren’s followers can get rid of him. Thank God for limited terms. Unfortunately, once a prophet; always a prophet. But the “real” system does actually have some checks and balances. Like with the CP group, they have a counsel instead one man. They agree on things that are doctrine and cultural, but they often disagree on things that have to do with community change and growth. They are sort of like a supreme court that teaches over the pulpit. And also, most meetings are filled with speakers called upon randomly from the crowd. Usually, a different counsel member will take charge of the meeting, so he will call upon people that will he feels will teach the truth, etc. It isn’t just one voice that is heard.

There are other meetings throughout the week where non-members are asked to teach on subjects that we may not know about. One day we had a pagan in teaching us about symbols of magic and stuff. Most of the crowd ignored him, but they were taught.

The “weakness” of these cults is that often times, it is one man that tries to be the leader, thinking that he was called of God, etc. One of the things that I actually like about the CP group is that many of the members have “doubts” about the callings of some of the counsel members. I think that is healthy to have a set of leaders that have a board enough spread in beliefs that everyone cannot agree with all of them.

Again, I’m not ashamed of my confusion. I’m just glad I’m not so stupid as to be confident with my limited knowledge.
chaster
QUOTE (Self Proclaimed Greatness @ May 14 2008, 01:17 PM)
He only got into power because of people's desire for salvation, their fear, their stupidity, and their weakness.

Well see. We do have a lot in common.
chaster
QUOTE (Cactus Jim @ May 14 2008, 02:57 AM)

Now, I have some important personal news. I did something I didn't expect today. I actually got out an oscilloscope and used it to troubleshoot a troublesome and baffling problem. Geez, I can't even remember the last time I used an actual oscilloscope. It was like reliving the happy parts of my childhood. It was GREAT! Had a little problem finding one as nobody could remember whether we'd thrown it out last cleanup. I even took pictures and sent them to the manufacturer. Via E-Mail of course.

There's a religious experience that resonates with me too. Amen, brother. Testify.
Powered by IP.Board v1.3 © 2003 - iPBFree v.2.1 © 2007