Polyg Talk > General Polyg Talk > Polygamy
Your Ad Here
Full Version: Fawn Broadbent
Cactus Jim
http://www.azcentral.com/news/specials/runningforalife/

Getting out of the FLDS isn't easy. I haven't been keeping up with her story, nor Fawn Holm's either. Some in this article criticize Fawn B for hooking up with a former FLDS guy who may still have polyg sympathies. What I've see over the years is, even people who have gotten involved, met people from the cult, and watched Big Love don't really relate to these folks they way they relate to each other. It's a shared background nobody else can be part of. There is a blog along with this article where people post their thoughts. Some criticize her for ignoring a full tuition scholarship in favor of taking up home making. Well, I did the same thing back in the paleolithic era. Over the years I've felt guilty I didn't pack up and go to college and get educated. But I don't know as I'd have made any more money and now I am so close to retirement that I can quit feeling guilty. Whatever, thing is Fawn has had to work so hard to catch up in school after experiencing Warren's homey school of ignernce and gospel, maybe she needs a rest.
uncaduff
don't really relate to these folks they way they relate to each other. It's a shared background nobody else can be part of
_
_________________________________________________________________
you've got that right Jim. we have a saying; "nobody but another plig,can talk to a plig" smile.gif
booboo
This polig bussines seem to be very strange from the legal point of view. Marriage in the legal sense is a contract where the state recognises by the isues the "marriage" certificate. This folks could not be issued more than one contract, tharefore in the bases of the law the rest of the "marriages" do not exist. Are we going on the slippery slope of the state mandating morality and religious beliefs? If this kids are separated from their parents and placed in foster homes is this action in the best interest of the children or the best interest of the state. The freedom of being stupid, wierd, different or ... who knows what... should be not infringed upon by the state. Aparently the members of the authorities stated that they just followed orders. I thought that we dispensed with that legal argument at the Nurenberg trals.
Powered by IP.Board v1.3 © 2003 - iPBFree v.2.1 © 2007